Please wait while the Pandalous reader loads...
Pandalous
The Place for Intelligent Conversation
 
 
 
  
Latest Post: March 23, 2010 at 7:28 AM
35 people participating
Spans 113 days

Pandalous reproduces the college experience online, in a new universal college of everyday life. Personal development after college is usually professionally oriented and not multi-dimensional. Pandalous allows you to constantly encounter and explore new ideas and areas of life, with a diverse community of participants, from university professors and students to journalists, artists, professionals, and monks. Join us in the experience of teaching and learning.

The internet doesn't have to be a waste of time.

Maybe some of you read Peggy Noonan's article in the WSJ over the weekend. (I have my disagreements with Ms. Noonan, but I make some attempt to read across the lines.) She asks: why do pictures of presidents become iconic? and gives the example of Ford stumbling on the way down the airplane steps. It wasn't that Ford was clumsy (he was actually a great athlete), but it happened at a time when everyone felt that he was bumbling politically: and so the image stuck. And became iconic. She submits the photo of Obama bowing to Emperor Akihito as an iconic image of this presidency.

Here's my question to you fellow Americans across the political spectrum: What does it mean that Obama's legacy is, essentially, becoming one of deference?

Where is the statesman we elected? Who replaced him with President O-BOW-ma?



Don't forget the bowing to the Saudi ruler



to republicans, the Chinese, the Olympic committee etc.

Will this be Obowma's legacy? It comes from worthy aspirations for sure, but it isn't received that way. Will it start working at some point - it isn't looking like that's going to happen.

He received some flack when bowing to the Saudi ruler but that had other implications and stopped quickly. The Japanese image could become more iconic as representing his presidency.


I think you're reading too much into his actions.  Certain customs are simply that, customs. They don't indicate some sort of hierarchical order or political deference.  To acknowledge another nation's customs is a way to build dialogue and I doubt if many in Japan or Saudi Arabia believe that Obama was in some way indicating anything other than politeness.  I certainly haven't read anything from the foreign press to indicate that to be the case.
I was brought up to say 'sir' or 'ma'am' to my elders.  That certainly doesn't mean that I agree with that person's beliefs or in some way see myself as inferior to them.  It's simply a sign of respect.  In a similar vein showing respect for another's culture is a good way to build bridges and should be encouraged.  I'm pretty sure that foreign leaders visiting Washington adhere to our customs and we should do the same when visiting them, president or not.


Reflecting back on President Obama's tenure and its legacy... wait, what year is it now? Doesn't he still have three more years to serve? Isn't it a bit early for passing judgment? If I hadn't known better, I would have suspected that this is wishful thinking.

Join the Community
Full Name:
Your Email:
New Password:
I Am:
Country:
By registering at Pandalous.com, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

  
Share: digg reddit delicious Facebook StumbleUpon Newsvine Mail to a FriendSubscribe to Discussion
Order:
  
Searching
No results found.